This Week in Cinema, I Learned…Oct 06-12 2024

Written by Cameron Geiser


Welcome to This Week in Cinema, a yearlong film criticism project wherein I will be watching a new film that I haven't seen every single day.

Welcome back to the Paddington Check-in. So far, so good. No need to break that glass, not yet  anyways. The second week of October continued the slasher marathon, but a few new players  entered the field including Jason of Friday the 13th fame and the freshly infamous Art the Clown  in Terrifier. In fact we begin the week with the final Scream film (for now) with Scream VI surprisingly my favorite film in the franchise, and while John Carpenter’s Christine isn’t exactly  a slasher, it does fit into that sub-genre tonally speaking. However we do begin sliding into  terrifying territory (Thanks Art) with the Original Japanese version of The Ring, just titled Ring here, and rounding out the week comes a clever concept-heavy jumpscare factory with Lights  Out.  

Since my time with Scream has come to an end, and after much deliberation my ranking of the  franchise is now locked in. From best to worst my final lineup is 6, 5, 2, 1, 3, and 4. Watching  the movies evolve over the course of six consecutive days was really something special. You  could see how each film was recontextualizing the Horror genre and how perceptions and  expectations of Horror films change over time with the taste of the audience evolving on a  parallel course. From riffing on the big slashers from the 1980s to digging at modern “Elevated  Horror” like Hereditary, The Lighthouse, Get Out, and The Babadook, Scream has always had a  deep love for the Horror genre as a whole. That love has also changed the genre itself, and  maybe I’m just a sucker for movies about movies, but I unabashedly ended up loving Scream.  Which was a gigantic surprise as I thought I might not enjoy them at all, or potentially find them  insufferable. I couldn’t be happier with how wrong I was. This week I learned that not all slasher  villains are alike (Art!), and once again, to let my expectations leave my body once the opening  credits begin. They really can be a dangerous thing!


October 6th

Scream VI (2023)

4/5

The most recent iteration of Scream takes the series to New York City and honestly the gimmick  did not disappoint. Sam (Melissa Barrera) and Tara (Jenna Ortega) have moved to the big apple  to get away from Woodsboro and their intricate past with the Ghostface killings. Right off the bat  this Scream is ALL about turning the tables on audience expectations. Sam and Tara are both  dealing with their trauma from the last film in their own ways while navigating college in the big  city. This time around we get two “false” Ghostface killers who are taken out by the actual  Ghostface killer of the film, and I liked that. Good twist on the formula. Now that the series has become a “Franchise” in the modern setting, the characters have to contend with the differences  in modern horror to what came before. At one point a character explaining “the rules” says that  “Anyone can go at any time… especially Sam and Tara” and all I could think was, “How  prescient…” What makes this film stand above the rest of the franchise, you might ask?

For me it was in the execution of the tension, the more visceral action sequences, and the fact that they  changed it up for this film while still very much staying within the headspace crafted by the previous films. This one also does not waste the New York City setting like some other horror  movies *cough* Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan *cough*. Matt  Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett wisely took this gigantic city and filmed it (Montreal, Canada, I  know, I know) in such a way to emphasize the inherent claustrophobia of the places and spaces  that feel iconic to the New York experience. Bodegas, the subway, high rises galore, Scream VI used the NYC setting to its advantage while honoring the past.

Speaking of the past, Gale and  Kirby both show up too! Kirby wasn’t what made Scream 4 a disappointment, in fact she was the  MVP of that film in my opinion. Gale is still consistently Gale, she wrote the book that the  Carpenter sisters asked her not to write. Because, you know, she *had* to. Also, not to be rude but it is shocking to see Courtney Cox transform over the years. No disrespect, but Gale sorta  looks like she’s been in her own version of The Substance when not popping up to check in on  the Ghostface killings. This was an excellent evolution in the series, and despite casting and crew  changes to the next one, I’m still looking forward to seeing what they do with the series. Highly recommended.


October 7th

Jason X (2001)

2.5/5

Having seen a good majority of the Friday The 13th movies, I’m honestly surprised I never got  around to watching this one because Jason X is easily the silliest slasher flick I’ve ever seen.  Don’t let the score fool you, while this isn’t exactly a “good” movie, I really enjoyed the heck  out of it. So, what little plot there is exists only to place Jason into space in the future and let him  loose with some new tech. Jason gets caught in the near future but since his Governmental  captors cannot kill him or keep him dead they decide to freeze him, unleashing a several hundred years time jump bringing him and the person he was actively stabbing to death into the year  2455.

By this time the earth had become too polluted to live on and humanity moved on to a  different planet, but occasionally the decaying planet is studied and on one such field trip a professor and his students accidentally discover Jason and his victim and bring them aboard their spaceship. Nanobots reanimate Jason after a bit and as you might expect, everything goes  haywire. What can I say? It’s a Friday The 13th Movie. Teenagers exist to have premarital sex  and be violently obliterated by the hockey mask wearing slasher icon. There are some decent  puns and good cheese to be had, but there were very clear budgetary limits for the set design and  the script wasn’t exactly “strong” either, but hey, that’s not why you come to watch Friday The  13th films, you watch to see Jason kill snot-nosed teenagers and trust-fund college kids.


October 8th

Wes Craven’s New Nightmare (1994)

4/5

The only Nightmare on Elm Street movie that I hadn’t seen is weirdly ironic to watch after  mainlining the entire Scream franchise first. Especially because Wes Craven’s New Nightmare is  essentially just a proto-Scream movie starring Freddy Krueger as Ghostface. I actually love the  core concept of the film, that instead of Robert Englund playing just Freddy Krueger, he’s playing a fictional version of himself on the set of a new Wes Craven Nightmare film wherein  he’s possessed by “The Real Entity” of Freddy Krueger who then starts killing the cast and crew  making the film. There's some great stuff in there using the actress from the first film and to be  frank the atmosphere that pervades the whole runtime is excellent and consistent. There was a lot  of effort and care put into not only the visual flare of the film, but also in the stellar set design,  especially once the third act starts to escalate exponentially. While it's not quite my favorite film  in the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise, it is a very good entry that recontextualizes the  supernatural side of the films and plays with the more imaginative aspects of the core idea of the series.


October 9th

Christine (1983)

3/5

Somehow, I never realized that Christine was a film directed by John Carpenter, based on a book written by Stephen King. These guys are two of my favorite artists in storytelling, and ironically I saw In The Mouth of Madness first, which is John Carpenter directing a film about H. P.  Lovecraft's style of stories, but bathed through a prism of Stephen King (Especially in the  depiction of Sutter Cane’s book covers). Anyways, this supernatural slasher is about a 1958  Plymouth Fury that's neglected for about twenty years before socially dubious teenager Arnie  (Keith Gordon) picks up the dusty old red and white clunker. Christine just needed a little T.L.C.-  however once she's cleaned up Arnies life starts taking a dive as Christine isn't just a classy car,  she's a jealous killer too. This one was a lot of fun, entirely predictable and easily digestible, but  what impressed me most were the special effects utilized in Christine's ability to repair herself, to  squeeze into hard to reach places, and in her controlling manipulative behavior. It's a great spooky tale to throw on, especially on rainy autumn nights.


October 10th

Ring (1998)

5/5

Having never seen either the American remake or the Japanese original film, respectively I  decided to go with the first version of this story. Through social osmosis I had heard the concept  of (the) Ring before, probably through the Scary Movie comedic parodies from the early 2000s in  my youth. If someone watches the cursed videotape, their phone will ring and they are  subsequently told that they will die in seven days. Psychological, atmospheric, and terrifying Ring is pure nightmare fuel through the ideas represented on screen. I almost don't want to  divulge more while simultaneously feeling the need to shake you by the shoulders and beg you to  watch this movie if you have any interest in horror films at all. The levels of tension achieved  here, alongside a truly great hook that evolves as the film runs on, combine for something truly  revelatory. Any great horror movie will stay with you after the credits roll, keeping you awake at  night through the implications of the ideas in the story, and Ring is definitely that movie. I love  any ending that implicates the viewer for even watching the film, and this one has an unforgettable third act. Simply, divine horror.


October 11th

Terrifier (2016)

2.5/5

Before the title card for Terrifier had even dropped, my stomach churned, laughter welling up in  my chest from anxious disgust, and my heartbeat had most definitely accelerated. I had just  witnessed the world of Art The Clown (David Howard Thornton). Well, specifically  writer-director Damien Leone's world of terror. So, what's the story? Well, that's not really the  point of the first one. The point is the shocking violence depicted on screen. Art is a supernatural  presence, taking the form of a Mime Clown dressed in black and white, that finds extreme joy in  killing, and comes across two unfortunate young women, Tara (Jenna Kanell) and Dawn  (Catherine Corcoran). This is the first film in a series of three completed films thus far, with  Leone citing plans for fourth and fifth entries.

To be completely honest with you, I did not enjoy  this one. I thought it was a miserable experience to watch. However, with the foresight of writing  this from the future, I do believe this film *had* to be a terribly bleak and dark experience to  make the next films really stand above this first entry. Also, David Howard Thornton's silent  performance as Art The Clown is, honestly, a cinematic treasure. If his macabre comedic  performance didn't work, Art would not have become a new horror franchise favorite. Then  there's Damien Leone, the writer-director-editor and special effects make-up artist of Terrifier. Leone deserves a lot of credit for this production as he was essentially the backbone of the whole  filmmaking side of things, and he did all this with essentially no money. The experience of  watching Terrifier wasn't all that great, but the indie filmmaking behind the scenes makes this  one special. Plus, the sequels were better (more on those next week).


October 12th

Lights Out (2016)

3/5

Lights Out is one of those films that has a real banger of a concept, but ends up fumbling it in the  back half of the third act. The whole conceit is that a being, called Diana in the film, who lives  only within shadows, has a symbiotic relationship with the mother of the main characters and  feeds on any innocent passersby unlucky enough to be caught in the dark. There are some decent  ideas when it comes to visual flare with regard to the light and dark concepts of flipping light  switches and having reality change based on that. There's also a handful of incredibly strong  sequences of tension, atmospheric terror, with good imagery intertwined with the fear of being  hunted. However, the writing is pretty bad at times. It's perfunctory and workmanlike, only there  to push the characters towards each new interaction with Diana. It's not a terrible horror movie but I do take issue with the ending. In all good conscience, I can't recommend stories where  suicide is the solution. That's probably more of a personal issue, but when you know people that  have taken their lives- it leaves an impact on you. So yes, I think there were better, stronger, ways to write yourself out of that ending.


Cameron Geiser is an avid consumer of films and books about filmmakers. He'll watch any film at least once, and can usually be spotted at the annual Traverse City Film Festival in Northern Michigan. He also writes about film over at www.spacecortezwrites.com.